"The Sons of Tammany," by Mike Carey, in Beyond Rue Morgue, edited by Paul Kane and Charles Prepolec, Titan Books, 2013.
Ever look at something simple and brilliant, like a Post-It Note, or White-Out, and say "why didn't I think of that?" Well, I have just had two of those Post-It moments.
There have been approximately seven gazillion attempts to rewrite Sherlock Holmes or create new stories about him but as far as I know Kane and Prepolec have come up with a brand new idea: invite the creation of new stories about the first literary sleuth, Edgar Allan Poe's C. Auguste Dupin. Brilliant idea! After all, Poe only wrote three. Plenty of room for more.
Honestly I don't know how good the book turned out, because I have only finished the first story. But that one is a doozy of a pastiche.
Let's take a moment to define pastiche, shall we? Some dictionaries say it means the same thing as parody. They're wrong. Some people use it to mean a new story about existing characters in imitation of the original; i.e. seven gazillion new Sherlock Holmes stories. I think there is another name for those: "fan fiction."
I reserve the word pastiche for stories that rethink the original and take a new take on it. See the British series Sherlock, for example.
It's possible that the rest of the stories in the book are fan fiction; I don't know. But Mike Carey has written a clever pastiche. "The Sons of Tammany" takes place in 1870 when an elderly Dupin visits New York and is shown around by a young cartoonist, the soon-to-be-famous Thomas Nast. As the title implies, they get involved with the corrupt gang at Tammany Hall -- and also with one of the greatest construction jobs of the ninetheenth century, the building of the Brooklyn Bridge.
Clever idea, and amusing writing.
Dupin had gotten the hang of summoning cabs now, and that was a terrible power to put in a Frenchman's hands.
Read it.
Sunday, September 8, 2013
Sunday, September 1, 2013
A Game Played, by Jonathan Rabb
"A Game Played," by Jonathan Rabb, in The Strand Magazine, June-September 2013.
Last week a private eye story, this week spies.
George Philby is a member of Britain's diplomatic core, stationed in Washington. He is a quiet, self-effacing man, and his great burden is his name. Kim Philby was the most famous British traitor in a century, so he is somewhat in the position of a man named Benedict Arnold joining the U.S. Army. "It made them all think too much, a sudden hesitation in the voice."
And in D.C. it leads to an odd friendship with Jack Crane, an American oil man. Crane brings Philby out of his shell a bit and the relationship leads to -- well, that would be telling. But one question this story asks is: Does your name determine your destiny?
I liked this low-key tale better the day after I read it. Then I read it a second time and liked it more.
Last week a private eye story, this week spies.
George Philby is a member of Britain's diplomatic core, stationed in Washington. He is a quiet, self-effacing man, and his great burden is his name. Kim Philby was the most famous British traitor in a century, so he is somewhat in the position of a man named Benedict Arnold joining the U.S. Army. "It made them all think too much, a sudden hesitation in the voice."
And in D.C. it leads to an odd friendship with Jack Crane, an American oil man. Crane brings Philby out of his shell a bit and the relationship leads to -- well, that would be telling. But one question this story asks is: Does your name determine your destiny?
I liked this low-key tale better the day after I read it. Then I read it a second time and liked it more.
Sunday, August 25, 2013
The Gypsy Ring, by James L. Ross
"The Gypsy Ring," by James L. Ross, in Alfred Hitchcock's Mystery Magazine, October 2013.
As I recall, Donald E. Westlake said that the essence of the private eye story can be found in the etymology of the phrase hardboiled dick. "Hardboiled," meaning a tough person to deal with, comes from the American army during World War I. "Dick," meaning detective, comes from Quebecois rumrunners during Prohibition. So the private eye story begins where the newly cynical veterans of the Great War met organized crime spawned by Prohibition.
Meaning, among other things, that the P.I. story dates from an era long past. So is it too dated to be of interest anymore? Let's see what James. L. Ross manages to do with it.
The story has a very traditional beginning. A woman's ring has been stolen. She wants it back but more importantly, she wants to know if her boyfriend is the thief.
How many motifs of the P.I. story show up om those two sentences? The female client. A hidden agenda behind a seemingly simple assignment.
But this is clearly a very modern story. For one thing the client quite casually explains that the boyfriend is the guy she sees when her fiance is out of town. And she works for a Wall Street firm that specializes in computerized trades based on miniscule momentary gaps between values of stocks. Finally, the nameless P.I. hero is also dealing with "my wife's boyfriend."
Not something Sam Spade had to worry about.
Of course, the ring just turns out to be the tip of the iceberg. There are murders, and theft, and corruption; areas where Mr. Spade would feel quite at home.
The P.I. story seems to be adjusting just fine.
As I recall, Donald E. Westlake said that the essence of the private eye story can be found in the etymology of the phrase hardboiled dick. "Hardboiled," meaning a tough person to deal with, comes from the American army during World War I. "Dick," meaning detective, comes from Quebecois rumrunners during Prohibition. So the private eye story begins where the newly cynical veterans of the Great War met organized crime spawned by Prohibition.
Meaning, among other things, that the P.I. story dates from an era long past. So is it too dated to be of interest anymore? Let's see what James. L. Ross manages to do with it.
The story has a very traditional beginning. A woman's ring has been stolen. She wants it back but more importantly, she wants to know if her boyfriend is the thief.
How many motifs of the P.I. story show up om those two sentences? The female client. A hidden agenda behind a seemingly simple assignment.
But this is clearly a very modern story. For one thing the client quite casually explains that the boyfriend is the guy she sees when her fiance is out of town. And she works for a Wall Street firm that specializes in computerized trades based on miniscule momentary gaps between values of stocks. Finally, the nameless P.I. hero is also dealing with "my wife's boyfriend."
Not something Sam Spade had to worry about.
Of course, the ring just turns out to be the tip of the iceberg. There are murders, and theft, and corruption; areas where Mr. Spade would feel quite at home.
The P.I. story seems to be adjusting just fine.
Sunday, August 18, 2013
The Last Sitcom, by Lawrence Maddox
"The Last Sitcom" by Lawrence Maddox, at Beat To A Pulp, 2013.
I remember reading a supposedly-true story (maybe in the I, Anonymous column of The Stranger?) about someone who found a cell phone on election night 2008. The owner had been texting and receiving viciously racist jokes. The finder composed a note in the owner's name confessing that his racism was a disguise for his sexual longing for Black men. He sent it to everyone on the owner's mailing list except his mother.
I was reminded of this by Maddox's story (freely available, by the way), about a sitcom writer who wanders into a computer cafe in L.A. and discovers that the previous user hadn't signed out. Turns out he was a member of a band called the Hillbilly Death Squad.
Doug, our alleged hero, decides to amuse himself by sending out some inappropriate emails in the name of the musician. As you can guess, bad things result.
It's a funny story, a sort of good luck/bad luck roller coaster as Doug and the musicians strive to get the upper hand. As for who wins, well, it isn't so much that have to find out for yourself, as that you have to decide for yourself.
Sunday, August 11, 2013
Dress Blues, by Chirs Muessig
"Dress Blues," by Chris Muessig, in Alfred Hitchcock's Mystery Magazine, October 2013.
Why did this story, definitely not science fiction, make me think of Isaac Asimov?
Glad you asked.
Some thirty years ago I heard Asimov speak and he said (I am paraphrasing, obviously) that science fiction's great contribution to literature was starting in the middle. If you think about it, nineteenth century fiction (and earlier) often started by telling you the hero's ancestry and background, describing the town, etc.
If science fiction began that way, you would never get to the story and readers would give up before you were halfway through detailing the planet's history. So science fiction writers learned to leap in and fill in the details where and when needed. Readers had to keep up and most of them found that they enjoyed it, I think because it gave them a mystery to solve (Oh, there are different bases on Luna, each founded by a different country as you can tell by their names...)
But one problem for a reviewer is: how much should he or she reveal? Take Muessig's story. It's not like there is a a big twist ending but he definitely expects you to sort out the time, place, and circumstance a bit at a time. And why should I deprive you of the pleasure?
The protagonist is Sergeant Nolan, a Marine sergeant who suddenly finds himself facing multiple crises. His wife has left him for reasons you will discover. He has to decide whether to re-enlist for another six-year hitch. And his boss goes off on extended duty, leaving him as the only Corps member to look after a private who has been arrested for murder. Worse, that private is a Black man and this story takes place in a time and place where that can be a dangerous place to be -- especially if you are accused of killing a white man.
A fascinating tale, and one that told me a lot I didn't know about its time period.
Why did this story, definitely not science fiction, make me think of Isaac Asimov?
Glad you asked.
Some thirty years ago I heard Asimov speak and he said (I am paraphrasing, obviously) that science fiction's great contribution to literature was starting in the middle. If you think about it, nineteenth century fiction (and earlier) often started by telling you the hero's ancestry and background, describing the town, etc.
If science fiction began that way, you would never get to the story and readers would give up before you were halfway through detailing the planet's history. So science fiction writers learned to leap in and fill in the details where and when needed. Readers had to keep up and most of them found that they enjoyed it, I think because it gave them a mystery to solve (Oh, there are different bases on Luna, each founded by a different country as you can tell by their names...)
But one problem for a reviewer is: how much should he or she reveal? Take Muessig's story. It's not like there is a a big twist ending but he definitely expects you to sort out the time, place, and circumstance a bit at a time. And why should I deprive you of the pleasure?
The protagonist is Sergeant Nolan, a Marine sergeant who suddenly finds himself facing multiple crises. His wife has left him for reasons you will discover. He has to decide whether to re-enlist for another six-year hitch. And his boss goes off on extended duty, leaving him as the only Corps member to look after a private who has been arrested for murder. Worse, that private is a Black man and this story takes place in a time and place where that can be a dangerous place to be -- especially if you are accused of killing a white man.
A fascinating tale, and one that told me a lot I didn't know about its time period.
Sunday, August 4, 2013
Borrowed Time, by Doug Allyn
"Borrowed Time," by Doug Allyn, in Ellery Queen's Mystery Magazine, September/October 2013.
The word "prequel" was apparently coined by Anthony Boucher in the 1950s, but I first heard it twenty years later when someone had the unfortunate idea of making a movie about Butch and Sundance before things started to get messy for them.
Prequels are one of those ideas that tend to sound better than they turn out. (Cough, cough, Star Wars) But as always the proof is in the pudding.
This story is a prequel to "Wood Smoke Boys," which made a lot of best-of lists last year, including mine. "Boys" is about Dylan LaCrosse, a cop in the north territory of Michigan. In the present story we learn about the circumstances that caused him to leave the Detroit Police Department and retreat back to his home turf in the north.
And the circumstances involve taking a bullet in the head in the middle of the kind of hellish cop's nightmare in which there can be no good action to take. LaCrosse survives the injury and is booted out of the force. Now to survive he has to deal with crooked cops and missing money.
A very satisfactory prequel. Maybe George Lucas should have hired Doug Allyn.
The word "prequel" was apparently coined by Anthony Boucher in the 1950s, but I first heard it twenty years later when someone had the unfortunate idea of making a movie about Butch and Sundance before things started to get messy for them.
Prequels are one of those ideas that tend to sound better than they turn out. (Cough, cough, Star Wars) But as always the proof is in the pudding.
This story is a prequel to "Wood Smoke Boys," which made a lot of best-of lists last year, including mine. "Boys" is about Dylan LaCrosse, a cop in the north territory of Michigan. In the present story we learn about the circumstances that caused him to leave the Detroit Police Department and retreat back to his home turf in the north.
And the circumstances involve taking a bullet in the head in the middle of the kind of hellish cop's nightmare in which there can be no good action to take. LaCrosse survives the injury and is booted out of the force. Now to survive he has to deal with crooked cops and missing money.
A very satisfactory prequel. Maybe George Lucas should have hired Doug Allyn.
Sunday, July 28, 2013
The Hunting Party, by Tony Richards
"The Hunting Party," by Tony Richards, in Alfred Hitchcock's Mystery Magazine, October 2013.
Editor Linda Landrigan has been doing something risky in AHMM in the last couple of years and I haven't seen anyone else mention it. She has occasionally published science fiction mysteries.
The usual thinking is that mystery fans don't want to read science fiction. I think it goes back to the idea that you can't have a fair-play mystery if the solution depends on the detective knowing that the Model K3 ray guy has a defenerator switch on the left side, not the right, or who was elected emperor in 2994. Of course, that's nonsense; a fair-play set in the present or past can be just as unfair.
Besides, most mystery stories today are not traditional fair-play, anyway.
Which is also true of Richards' tale. It is (at least) the second story about Lieutenant Abel Enetame, a cop in Federated Africa, a continent that has made tremendous gains over today's gloomy situation. Unfortunately there are some fanatics who want to force a return to the good old days of tribal violence.
The leader of this group, Chief Manuza, appeared in the first story. Now he is more dangerous because he has an ally, a Nobel Prize-winning physicist named Kanai.
"There is a saying in the scientific world," Mweru told me. "Einstein stood on the shoulders of others. Kanai stood on the shoulders of Einstein...and then just floated off into thin air."
Such a man could give Manuza's rebels a dangerous weapon in their fight against progress. But weapons can be dangerous in more ways than one as we learn in the stories very satisfying ending.
Editor Linda Landrigan has been doing something risky in AHMM in the last couple of years and I haven't seen anyone else mention it. She has occasionally published science fiction mysteries.
The usual thinking is that mystery fans don't want to read science fiction. I think it goes back to the idea that you can't have a fair-play mystery if the solution depends on the detective knowing that the Model K3 ray guy has a defenerator switch on the left side, not the right, or who was elected emperor in 2994. Of course, that's nonsense; a fair-play set in the present or past can be just as unfair.
Besides, most mystery stories today are not traditional fair-play, anyway.
Which is also true of Richards' tale. It is (at least) the second story about Lieutenant Abel Enetame, a cop in Federated Africa, a continent that has made tremendous gains over today's gloomy situation. Unfortunately there are some fanatics who want to force a return to the good old days of tribal violence.
The leader of this group, Chief Manuza, appeared in the first story. Now he is more dangerous because he has an ally, a Nobel Prize-winning physicist named Kanai.
"There is a saying in the scientific world," Mweru told me. "Einstein stood on the shoulders of others. Kanai stood on the shoulders of Einstein...and then just floated off into thin air."
Such a man could give Manuza's rebels a dangerous weapon in their fight against progress. But weapons can be dangerous in more ways than one as we learn in the stories very satisfying ending.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)