"The Murderer At The Cabin," by Robert Holt, in All Hallow's Evil, edited by Sarah E. Glenn, Mystery and Horror, LLC.
As I have said before, occasionally I will get a page or two into a story and think Okay, the Best Of slot is yours to lose, friend. Don't screw up.
Mr. Holt didn't screw up. The odd thing is, this tale is more horror than mystery, and therefore not my usual thing at all. But the concept is clever and the follow-through is close to perfect. I worried about revealing too much and everything I am about to tell you appears in the first quarter of the story. But if you have an intense dislike of spoilers feel free to stop reading this and go find the story.
Lexington is a very bad fella. He's a serial killer with a complicated system of picking his victims and a suitably insane motive. As the story starts he is looking for a new person to focus his attention on. And he finds one in a cabin in the woods where a dozen wealthy people are holding a meeting. So he takes his hatchet and prepares to single out his first victim.
Now, you might well be saying: hold it. This is nothing special. It's the plot of any slasher movie.
Yes, but here's the twist. The people in the cabin have paid big money for a high-grade murder theatre experience, complete with elaborate props and make-up. So when Lexington starts his work they think it's part of the show.
Okay, now it's up to a slightly clever slasher flick.
Then how about the second twist? Unlike the seemingly omniscient monsters in those movies, Lexington doesn't know about the mystery theatre aspect and he is as baffled by his victims as they are by him.
What we have here is a failure to communicate. And that's a lot of bloody fun.
Sunday, October 13, 2013
Sunday, October 6, 2013
Dead and Buried Treasure, by Barb Goffman
"Dead and Buried Treasure," by Barb Goffman, in All Hallow's Evil, edited by Sarah E. Glenn, Mystery and Horror, LLC.
The creators' of this book were kind enough to send me a copy. Thirteen stories with a Halloween theme. So far, this bit of romantic suspense is my fave.
At age twenty-five, Lizzie is the last member of her college crowd to remain single, a fact that her dear friends are not about mentioning. At a wedding she meets a waiter who seems like a nice guy, but those same friends -- all married to doctors and lawyers, all thinner and more attractive than Lizzie -- are incredulous of the very idea of dating a waiter.
And Lizzie begins to wonder who her friends are, in more senses than one. Eventually, of course, there is a crime, and that reminded me of a very old joke about the difference between friends and real friends.
There is a twist at the end that didn't turn the whole story upside down but did make me say hmm...
A fun read.
The creators' of this book were kind enough to send me a copy. Thirteen stories with a Halloween theme. So far, this bit of romantic suspense is my fave.
At age twenty-five, Lizzie is the last member of her college crowd to remain single, a fact that her dear friends are not about mentioning. At a wedding she meets a waiter who seems like a nice guy, but those same friends -- all married to doctors and lawyers, all thinner and more attractive than Lizzie -- are incredulous of the very idea of dating a waiter.
And Lizzie begins to wonder who her friends are, in more senses than one. Eventually, of course, there is a crime, and that reminded me of a very old joke about the difference between friends and real friends.
There is a twist at the end that didn't turn the whole story upside down but did make me say hmm...
A fun read.
Sunday, September 29, 2013
The Wentworth Letter, by Jeff Soloway
"The Wentworth Letter," by Jeff Soloway, in Malfeasance Occasional: Girl Trouble, edited by Clare Toohey.
The folks at Criminal Element have produced what they (and I) hope will be the first in a long series of e-anthologies. I should say I have a story in this collection, so I have reason to be fond of it. Editor Toohey has organized these stories of "girl trouble" in a way that I have never encountered before: from least to most graphic. In other words, things will get nastier as you move through the text. (My story comes about halfway through.)
I am still in the light and fluffy section I guess, and very much enjoyed this story by Jeff Soloway. It starts with a new student arriving in a college class studying the works of Jane Austen. Alex is the only man in the class and he is vulgar and rude. He also claims to have a rare letter written by Austen (and recently stolen from a museum).
The professor, Charles, happens to be the son of a wealthy woman who is an Austen fanatic. He's also sleeping with one of his students. Things get very complicated fast.
And besides a clever plot there is wonderful writing. Take the scene in which the professor's overbearing mother meets his lover for the first time, semi-dressed in his bedroom.
"I suppose your father is something virtuous, like a policeman or a tennis instructor?"
"You'll have to ask him," said Cheryl. "First you'd have to find him. My mother's a bank teller."
"And you're an English major. I'm sure she hopes you go to law school."
"All she wants for me is a job where I don't have to make change."
"Consider taking credit cards, dear. Charles, when you're done disgracing your profession, please make an appearance downstairs....Without concubine."
This story plays in two ways on the theme of girl trouble. First is the professor's involvement with his student. Second is the debate over whether Jane Austen is merely "women's fiction," and somehow less worthy of study than serious fiction written, by male authors. In light of the recent David Gilmour controversy the tale is oddly topical.
The folks at Criminal Element have produced what they (and I) hope will be the first in a long series of e-anthologies. I should say I have a story in this collection, so I have reason to be fond of it. Editor Toohey has organized these stories of "girl trouble" in a way that I have never encountered before: from least to most graphic. In other words, things will get nastier as you move through the text. (My story comes about halfway through.)
I am still in the light and fluffy section I guess, and very much enjoyed this story by Jeff Soloway. It starts with a new student arriving in a college class studying the works of Jane Austen. Alex is the only man in the class and he is vulgar and rude. He also claims to have a rare letter written by Austen (and recently stolen from a museum).
The professor, Charles, happens to be the son of a wealthy woman who is an Austen fanatic. He's also sleeping with one of his students. Things get very complicated fast.
And besides a clever plot there is wonderful writing. Take the scene in which the professor's overbearing mother meets his lover for the first time, semi-dressed in his bedroom.
"I suppose your father is something virtuous, like a policeman or a tennis instructor?"
"You'll have to ask him," said Cheryl. "First you'd have to find him. My mother's a bank teller."
"And you're an English major. I'm sure she hopes you go to law school."
"All she wants for me is a job where I don't have to make change."
"Consider taking credit cards, dear. Charles, when you're done disgracing your profession, please make an appearance downstairs....Without concubine."
This story plays in two ways on the theme of girl trouble. First is the professor's involvement with his student. Second is the debate over whether Jane Austen is merely "women's fiction," and somehow less worthy of study than serious fiction written, by male authors. In light of the recent David Gilmour controversy the tale is oddly topical.
Sunday, September 22, 2013
The Queen of Yongju-gol, by Martin Limón
"The Queen of Yongju-gol," by Martin Limón, in Alfred Hitchcock's Mystery Magazine,
November 2013.
As I said last time I reviewed one of Martin's stories here, all of his books are set in South Korea in the 1970s. In this tale he has changed time but not place, and his series characters, two army investigators, are nowhere to be seen. Instead the hero is Roh Yonk-bok, one of the wealthiest men in Korea.
But, as we learn, he didn't start out that way. He was able to get an education only through money sent back home from his big sister who was working as a bar girl in Yongju-gol, a community that served American G.I.'s, where Koreans were forbidden as customers. One day his sister disappeared and now, years later, Roh is determined to find out what happened to her.
It is a dark tale, full of betrayal and hard-learned cynicism.
"Canyou trust these people, sir?"
Roh turned to look at his bodyguard. He was a faithful man -- in fact chosen for that quality -- and competent at his job, but he had little imagination.
"They want money, don't they?" Roh replied.
"Yes, sir."
"Then I have trust. Not for them but for their greed."
November 2013.
As I said last time I reviewed one of Martin's stories here, all of his books are set in South Korea in the 1970s. In this tale he has changed time but not place, and his series characters, two army investigators, are nowhere to be seen. Instead the hero is Roh Yonk-bok, one of the wealthiest men in Korea.
But, as we learn, he didn't start out that way. He was able to get an education only through money sent back home from his big sister who was working as a bar girl in Yongju-gol, a community that served American G.I.'s, where Koreans were forbidden as customers. One day his sister disappeared and now, years later, Roh is determined to find out what happened to her.
It is a dark tale, full of betrayal and hard-learned cynicism.
"Canyou trust these people, sir?"
Roh turned to look at his bodyguard. He was a faithful man -- in fact chosen for that quality -- and competent at his job, but he had little imagination.
"They want money, don't they?" Roh replied.
"Yes, sir."
"Then I have trust. Not for them but for their greed."
Sunday, September 15, 2013
Small Kingdoms, by Charlaine Harris
"Small Kingdoms," by Charlaine Harris, in Ellery Queen's Mystery Magazine, November 2013.
On this particular spring Tuesday, Anne Dewitt was thrown off her regular schedule. Between brushing her teeth and putting on her foundation, she had to kill a man.
Got your attention? I would think so. This story has a lovely opening, reminiscent of my favorite start to a Richard Stark Novel: When the phone rang, Parker was in the garage, killing a man. (Firebreak)
I have never read Ms. Harris before but as I understand it she had made her reputation throwing unlikely worlds together. Anne DeWitt is, of all things, a high school principal, but as you can guess from her ability to off a bad guy in her bathroom before breakfast, she has a past. The past not only explains her ease at handling a killer, but also the presence of the killer.
Besides transporting a dead body she also has to deal with unreasonable demands and criminal behavior by the shcool's star athlete. Fortunately she finds an unlikely ally.
Was this story a bit of wish-fulfillment? If every school had a staff member who could handle problems so efficiently, our academic careers might have been more pleasant. For the good guys, at least.
On this particular spring Tuesday, Anne Dewitt was thrown off her regular schedule. Between brushing her teeth and putting on her foundation, she had to kill a man.
Got your attention? I would think so. This story has a lovely opening, reminiscent of my favorite start to a Richard Stark Novel: When the phone rang, Parker was in the garage, killing a man. (Firebreak)
I have never read Ms. Harris before but as I understand it she had made her reputation throwing unlikely worlds together. Anne DeWitt is, of all things, a high school principal, but as you can guess from her ability to off a bad guy in her bathroom before breakfast, she has a past. The past not only explains her ease at handling a killer, but also the presence of the killer.
Besides transporting a dead body she also has to deal with unreasonable demands and criminal behavior by the shcool's star athlete. Fortunately she finds an unlikely ally.
Was this story a bit of wish-fulfillment? If every school had a staff member who could handle problems so efficiently, our academic careers might have been more pleasant. For the good guys, at least.
Sunday, September 8, 2013
The Sons of Tammany, by Mike Carey
"The Sons of Tammany," by Mike Carey, in Beyond Rue Morgue, edited by Paul Kane and Charles Prepolec, Titan Books, 2013.
Ever look at something simple and brilliant, like a Post-It Note, or White-Out, and say "why didn't I think of that?" Well, I have just had two of those Post-It moments.
There have been approximately seven gazillion attempts to rewrite Sherlock Holmes or create new stories about him but as far as I know Kane and Prepolec have come up with a brand new idea: invite the creation of new stories about the first literary sleuth, Edgar Allan Poe's C. Auguste Dupin. Brilliant idea! After all, Poe only wrote three. Plenty of room for more.
Honestly I don't know how good the book turned out, because I have only finished the first story. But that one is a doozy of a pastiche.
Let's take a moment to define pastiche, shall we? Some dictionaries say it means the same thing as parody. They're wrong. Some people use it to mean a new story about existing characters in imitation of the original; i.e. seven gazillion new Sherlock Holmes stories. I think there is another name for those: "fan fiction."
I reserve the word pastiche for stories that rethink the original and take a new take on it. See the British series Sherlock, for example.
It's possible that the rest of the stories in the book are fan fiction; I don't know. But Mike Carey has written a clever pastiche. "The Sons of Tammany" takes place in 1870 when an elderly Dupin visits New York and is shown around by a young cartoonist, the soon-to-be-famous Thomas Nast. As the title implies, they get involved with the corrupt gang at Tammany Hall -- and also with one of the greatest construction jobs of the ninetheenth century, the building of the Brooklyn Bridge.
Clever idea, and amusing writing.
Dupin had gotten the hang of summoning cabs now, and that was a terrible power to put in a Frenchman's hands.
Read it.
Ever look at something simple and brilliant, like a Post-It Note, or White-Out, and say "why didn't I think of that?" Well, I have just had two of those Post-It moments.
There have been approximately seven gazillion attempts to rewrite Sherlock Holmes or create new stories about him but as far as I know Kane and Prepolec have come up with a brand new idea: invite the creation of new stories about the first literary sleuth, Edgar Allan Poe's C. Auguste Dupin. Brilliant idea! After all, Poe only wrote three. Plenty of room for more.
Honestly I don't know how good the book turned out, because I have only finished the first story. But that one is a doozy of a pastiche.
Let's take a moment to define pastiche, shall we? Some dictionaries say it means the same thing as parody. They're wrong. Some people use it to mean a new story about existing characters in imitation of the original; i.e. seven gazillion new Sherlock Holmes stories. I think there is another name for those: "fan fiction."
I reserve the word pastiche for stories that rethink the original and take a new take on it. See the British series Sherlock, for example.
It's possible that the rest of the stories in the book are fan fiction; I don't know. But Mike Carey has written a clever pastiche. "The Sons of Tammany" takes place in 1870 when an elderly Dupin visits New York and is shown around by a young cartoonist, the soon-to-be-famous Thomas Nast. As the title implies, they get involved with the corrupt gang at Tammany Hall -- and also with one of the greatest construction jobs of the ninetheenth century, the building of the Brooklyn Bridge.
Clever idea, and amusing writing.
Dupin had gotten the hang of summoning cabs now, and that was a terrible power to put in a Frenchman's hands.
Read it.
Sunday, September 1, 2013
A Game Played, by Jonathan Rabb
"A Game Played," by Jonathan Rabb, in The Strand Magazine, June-September 2013.
Last week a private eye story, this week spies.
George Philby is a member of Britain's diplomatic core, stationed in Washington. He is a quiet, self-effacing man, and his great burden is his name. Kim Philby was the most famous British traitor in a century, so he is somewhat in the position of a man named Benedict Arnold joining the U.S. Army. "It made them all think too much, a sudden hesitation in the voice."
And in D.C. it leads to an odd friendship with Jack Crane, an American oil man. Crane brings Philby out of his shell a bit and the relationship leads to -- well, that would be telling. But one question this story asks is: Does your name determine your destiny?
I liked this low-key tale better the day after I read it. Then I read it a second time and liked it more.
Last week a private eye story, this week spies.
George Philby is a member of Britain's diplomatic core, stationed in Washington. He is a quiet, self-effacing man, and his great burden is his name. Kim Philby was the most famous British traitor in a century, so he is somewhat in the position of a man named Benedict Arnold joining the U.S. Army. "It made them all think too much, a sudden hesitation in the voice."
And in D.C. it leads to an odd friendship with Jack Crane, an American oil man. Crane brings Philby out of his shell a bit and the relationship leads to -- well, that would be telling. But one question this story asks is: Does your name determine your destiny?
I liked this low-key tale better the day after I read it. Then I read it a second time and liked it more.
Sunday, August 25, 2013
The Gypsy Ring, by James L. Ross
"The Gypsy Ring," by James L. Ross, in Alfred Hitchcock's Mystery Magazine, October 2013.
As I recall, Donald E. Westlake said that the essence of the private eye story can be found in the etymology of the phrase hardboiled dick. "Hardboiled," meaning a tough person to deal with, comes from the American army during World War I. "Dick," meaning detective, comes from Quebecois rumrunners during Prohibition. So the private eye story begins where the newly cynical veterans of the Great War met organized crime spawned by Prohibition.
Meaning, among other things, that the P.I. story dates from an era long past. So is it too dated to be of interest anymore? Let's see what James. L. Ross manages to do with it.
The story has a very traditional beginning. A woman's ring has been stolen. She wants it back but more importantly, she wants to know if her boyfriend is the thief.
How many motifs of the P.I. story show up om those two sentences? The female client. A hidden agenda behind a seemingly simple assignment.
But this is clearly a very modern story. For one thing the client quite casually explains that the boyfriend is the guy she sees when her fiance is out of town. And she works for a Wall Street firm that specializes in computerized trades based on miniscule momentary gaps between values of stocks. Finally, the nameless P.I. hero is also dealing with "my wife's boyfriend."
Not something Sam Spade had to worry about.
Of course, the ring just turns out to be the tip of the iceberg. There are murders, and theft, and corruption; areas where Mr. Spade would feel quite at home.
The P.I. story seems to be adjusting just fine.
As I recall, Donald E. Westlake said that the essence of the private eye story can be found in the etymology of the phrase hardboiled dick. "Hardboiled," meaning a tough person to deal with, comes from the American army during World War I. "Dick," meaning detective, comes from Quebecois rumrunners during Prohibition. So the private eye story begins where the newly cynical veterans of the Great War met organized crime spawned by Prohibition.
Meaning, among other things, that the P.I. story dates from an era long past. So is it too dated to be of interest anymore? Let's see what James. L. Ross manages to do with it.
The story has a very traditional beginning. A woman's ring has been stolen. She wants it back but more importantly, she wants to know if her boyfriend is the thief.
How many motifs of the P.I. story show up om those two sentences? The female client. A hidden agenda behind a seemingly simple assignment.
But this is clearly a very modern story. For one thing the client quite casually explains that the boyfriend is the guy she sees when her fiance is out of town. And she works for a Wall Street firm that specializes in computerized trades based on miniscule momentary gaps between values of stocks. Finally, the nameless P.I. hero is also dealing with "my wife's boyfriend."
Not something Sam Spade had to worry about.
Of course, the ring just turns out to be the tip of the iceberg. There are murders, and theft, and corruption; areas where Mr. Spade would feel quite at home.
The P.I. story seems to be adjusting just fine.
Sunday, August 18, 2013
The Last Sitcom, by Lawrence Maddox
"The Last Sitcom" by Lawrence Maddox, at Beat To A Pulp, 2013.
I remember reading a supposedly-true story (maybe in the I, Anonymous column of The Stranger?) about someone who found a cell phone on election night 2008. The owner had been texting and receiving viciously racist jokes. The finder composed a note in the owner's name confessing that his racism was a disguise for his sexual longing for Black men. He sent it to everyone on the owner's mailing list except his mother.
I was reminded of this by Maddox's story (freely available, by the way), about a sitcom writer who wanders into a computer cafe in L.A. and discovers that the previous user hadn't signed out. Turns out he was a member of a band called the Hillbilly Death Squad.
Doug, our alleged hero, decides to amuse himself by sending out some inappropriate emails in the name of the musician. As you can guess, bad things result.
It's a funny story, a sort of good luck/bad luck roller coaster as Doug and the musicians strive to get the upper hand. As for who wins, well, it isn't so much that have to find out for yourself, as that you have to decide for yourself.
Sunday, August 11, 2013
Dress Blues, by Chirs Muessig
"Dress Blues," by Chris Muessig, in Alfred Hitchcock's Mystery Magazine, October 2013.
Why did this story, definitely not science fiction, make me think of Isaac Asimov?
Glad you asked.
Some thirty years ago I heard Asimov speak and he said (I am paraphrasing, obviously) that science fiction's great contribution to literature was starting in the middle. If you think about it, nineteenth century fiction (and earlier) often started by telling you the hero's ancestry and background, describing the town, etc.
If science fiction began that way, you would never get to the story and readers would give up before you were halfway through detailing the planet's history. So science fiction writers learned to leap in and fill in the details where and when needed. Readers had to keep up and most of them found that they enjoyed it, I think because it gave them a mystery to solve (Oh, there are different bases on Luna, each founded by a different country as you can tell by their names...)
But one problem for a reviewer is: how much should he or she reveal? Take Muessig's story. It's not like there is a a big twist ending but he definitely expects you to sort out the time, place, and circumstance a bit at a time. And why should I deprive you of the pleasure?
The protagonist is Sergeant Nolan, a Marine sergeant who suddenly finds himself facing multiple crises. His wife has left him for reasons you will discover. He has to decide whether to re-enlist for another six-year hitch. And his boss goes off on extended duty, leaving him as the only Corps member to look after a private who has been arrested for murder. Worse, that private is a Black man and this story takes place in a time and place where that can be a dangerous place to be -- especially if you are accused of killing a white man.
A fascinating tale, and one that told me a lot I didn't know about its time period.
Why did this story, definitely not science fiction, make me think of Isaac Asimov?
Glad you asked.
Some thirty years ago I heard Asimov speak and he said (I am paraphrasing, obviously) that science fiction's great contribution to literature was starting in the middle. If you think about it, nineteenth century fiction (and earlier) often started by telling you the hero's ancestry and background, describing the town, etc.
If science fiction began that way, you would never get to the story and readers would give up before you were halfway through detailing the planet's history. So science fiction writers learned to leap in and fill in the details where and when needed. Readers had to keep up and most of them found that they enjoyed it, I think because it gave them a mystery to solve (Oh, there are different bases on Luna, each founded by a different country as you can tell by their names...)
But one problem for a reviewer is: how much should he or she reveal? Take Muessig's story. It's not like there is a a big twist ending but he definitely expects you to sort out the time, place, and circumstance a bit at a time. And why should I deprive you of the pleasure?
The protagonist is Sergeant Nolan, a Marine sergeant who suddenly finds himself facing multiple crises. His wife has left him for reasons you will discover. He has to decide whether to re-enlist for another six-year hitch. And his boss goes off on extended duty, leaving him as the only Corps member to look after a private who has been arrested for murder. Worse, that private is a Black man and this story takes place in a time and place where that can be a dangerous place to be -- especially if you are accused of killing a white man.
A fascinating tale, and one that told me a lot I didn't know about its time period.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)